Conscious Investing Today
  • Top News
  • Business Insider
  • Economic Indicators
  • Investing Ideas
  • Politics News
  • Stock Analysis
  • Editor’s Pick
No Result
View All Result
  • Top News
  • Business Insider
  • Economic Indicators
  • Investing Ideas
  • Politics News
  • Stock Analysis
  • Editor’s Pick
No Result
View All Result
Conscious Investing Today
No Result
View All Result
Home Politics News

Renewable Energy, a revisit

by
April 4, 2021
in Politics News
0
Renewable Energy, a revisit
0
SHARES
4
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
ADVERTISEMENT
Romeo L. Bernardo-125

By Romeo L. Bernardo


PCH.VECTOR/ FREEPIK

1 of 2

(First of two parts)

In my column a decade ago, “Renewable energy — reality check” (https://www.fef.org.ph/fef/renewable-energy-reality-check/) I chided the private proponents of new renewable energy (RE) technologies (solar, wind, and biomass), the National Renewable Energy Board (NREB), and multilateral institutions for pushing an expensive Feed-in Tariff (FiT) program on the Philippines on the grounds that we need to do this as our contribution to averting a climate change catastrophe. This notwithstanding our global carbon emission contribution being a rounding error (0.3 of 1%), and our RE mix then at 42% of total power generation capacity, four times the global average.

I noted in my article then that this would have burdened us with 20-year supply contracts with power costs that were equivalent to P10 to P25 per kWh, twice to five times the regular cost. This is not even counting the cost of ancillary standby power to cover RE intermittency (when there is no wind or when it is cloudy) and their needed transmission and distribution infrastructure.

Thanks to the advocacy on behalf of consumers and taxpayers by the Foundation for Economic Freedom, the PCCI, and the wise intervention of then-Senate Energy Committee Chair Serge Osmena, the final FiT rates were negotiated down substantially.

Fast forward 10 years to today, and we find that just counting the direct cost of FiT subsidy payments to RE providers now runs at P20 billion annually. For perspective, this is the equivalent to the conditional cash transfer social assistance for 10 million of the poorest people in 2019, and is around the annual budgets of each of the following executive departments: Environment and Natural Resources, Finance, Foreign Affairs, Justice, and Science and Technology. And P20 billion is an annual number; for the long run cost, multiply that by 20 years, the contract period.

Since then the prices, especially of solar panels, have dropped; is it now time to embrace them unqualifiedly? And should government mandate them through quotas like Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS), excise taxes like the recent coal tax insertions in TRAIN 1 (see my column https://www.bworldonline.com/gravy-train-leaving-common-sense-isnt/), or restrictions on building new fossil plants?

Consider: if indeed the drop in RE prices and technology improvements now make them commercially competitive with fossil fuels as contended by their champions, there should be no need for more subsidies, direct or hidden: No FiT, no quotas, and no taxes and bans on coal. (Riding on this lobby are the advocates of natural gas, passing it off as green and renewable, even while gas has half the carbon footprint of coal, and is not renewable.)

Precisely because such non-technology neutral government interventions are an override on market competition, they have the effect of raising the cost of power, particularly problematic for a country like the Philippines that has yet to develop a manufacturing base to absorb the millions of jobless. Manufacturing requires base load plants which, setting aside controversial nuclear plants, can only be driven by fossil fuels.

How high is that cost burden now? To illustrate further, compare the current FiT rates for solar and wind of P8 to P10 per kWh for 20 years vs. the competitively bided cost of P4.15/P4.26 per kwh in the recent CSP bidding of Meralco (“2 SMC units submit lowest bids for 1,800 MW Meralco supply deal,” Feb. 20).

And what have we got to show for this heavy cost? Very little. This conclusion is validated by a study by Dr. Josef Yap (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3520401) that even counted as FiT benefits the so-called merit order effect of RE, a contestable notion. (Any power supply contract with lower marginal cost than peaking plants will have identical effect, and is not unique to RE.)

Moreover, solar and wind generation together only accounts for 2.4% of total generation. The bulk of our RE still comes from traditional renewables, hydro and geothermal (20%) that do not enjoy, nor lobby for, such subsidies or quota mandates.

This heavy public cost of supporting such expensive RE is mirrored at the global level in states and countries that embraced such vs. those who didn’t.

Electricity prices in RE supportive California rose five times more than the rest of the US. German electricity prices rose 51% from 2006-2018, and now stand at twice the level of mostly nuclear powered France on whom they depend to stabilize their RE heavy and thus unstable grid.

CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION VS MITIGATION
In Paris in 2015, the Aquino administration committed our country to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions by 70% by 2030, an ambitious, costly, and unrealistic target. The Climate Change Commission said the country needs to spend $12 billion to $15 billion, or P584 billion to P730 billion, to reduce up to 70% of its emissions. A staggeringly large number equivalent to 3.25% to 4% of our GDP.

This likely does not even fully reflect the higher cost of power and the cost of managing intermittency discussed earlier. And as I argued, this yields very little for the country and our people. (Maybe except for green bragging rights? It is as if a poor man wore an Armani suit he cannot afford and is inappropriate for his tropical country to look fashionable.)

I have been following the Facebook page of Finance Secretary Sonny Dominguez, newly designated chairman of the Climate Change Commission. An astute fiscal manager of our country’s scarce resources who deeply cares for our people, he quickly pivoted away from the climate change mitigation chorus and into grounded actionable climate change adaptation programs.

ADVERTISEMENT

And I quote a post on the Department of Finance Facebook page:

“Why does the Philippines focus more on climate adaptation rather than mitigation?

“Despite the Philippines being one of the lowest contributors to global GreenHouse Gas Emissions (GHGs) at around 0.3%, we are still one of the most vulnerable countries to the effects of climate change.

“This is why our climate action efforts focus more on climate adaptation rather than mitigation. We need to adapt and be prepared for the harmful effects of natural disasters (e.g., typhoons, drought, rising ocean temperatures, etc.) brought about by climate change.” (Department of Finance – Posts | Facebook.)

Amen!

The Climate Change Commission may have reaffirmed, even strengthened, its 2015 commitments, perhaps before Mr. Dominguez assumed its chairmanship. My appeal: please review and align with your most recent sound pronouncements, Secretary Sonny?

(Part 2 of this column will discuss the energy trilemma: the need to balance energy security, energy equity/affordability, and energy sustainability using the World Economic Forum framework, regulatory philosophy and practice under EPIRA, and a suggested RE transition roadmap for the Philippines).

Romeo L. Bernardo was finance undersecretary during the Cory Aquino and Fidel Ramos Administrations. He is currently GlobalSource Partners Philippine Adviser (globalsourcepartners.com). He is also an independent director in the largest renewable energy company in the Philippines, Aboitiz Power.





Related Posts

World Bank: More than half of Filipinos have bank accounts
Politics News

World Bank: More than half of Filipinos have bank accounts

June 29, 2022
Gov’t awards port projects in Palawan, Leyte and Batangas
Politics News

Gov’t awards port projects in Palawan, Leyte and Batangas

June 29, 2022
Q2 office demand more than doubles
Politics News

Q2 office demand more than doubles

June 29, 2022
Next Post
The message of Resurrection (the music)

The message of Resurrection (the music)

Anti-Asian racism is also rising in Canada

Talent is enough

Talent is enough

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

Categories

  • Economic Indicators
  • Editor's Pick
  • Investing Ideas
  • Politics News
  • Stock Analysis

Popular News

  • A Minute With: Family Reunion cast on relatable story lines

    A Minute With: Family Reunion cast on relatable story lines

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Twitter launches ‘Milk Tea Alliance’ emoji as movement grows

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Gas and car bills to soar under green revolution

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Level up your gaming experience with vivo Y20s [G]

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Rehab, expansion of General Santos airport seen completed by Q2

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
No Result
View All Result

Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

Highlights

Tips for Cutting a Cigar without a Cutter

World Bank: More than half of Filipinos have bank accounts

Gov’t awards port projects in Palawan, Leyte and Batangas

Q2 office demand more than doubles

Peso sinks to P55-a-dollar level

South Korean office workers hit convenience stores as ‘lunch-flation’ bites

Trending

How to Stay Safe while Jet Skiing
Editor's Pick

How to Stay Safe while Jet Skiing

by
June 29, 2022
0

Jet skiing is a fun and safe water sport with many physical and health benefits. However, as...

5 Tips for Online Casino Promotions

5 Tips for Online Casino Promotions

June 29, 2022
Getting to Know You: Frank Farricker, President of Lockwood and Meade Real Estate

Getting to Know You: Frank Farricker, President of Lockwood and Meade Real Estate

June 29, 2022
Tips for Cutting a Cigar without a Cutter

Tips for Cutting a Cigar without a Cutter

June 29, 2022
World Bank: More than half of Filipinos have bank accounts

World Bank: More than half of Filipinos have bank accounts

June 29, 2022

Disclaimer: ConsciousInvestingToday.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice.
The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Contact Us
  • Email Whitelisting

Copyright © 2021 ConsciousInvestingToday. All Rights Reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Contact Us
  • Email Whitelisting

© 2022 JNews - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by Jegtheme.